Tag: History

Tirteu, I break up II, 31-34 (=8 Diehl) ' ' That it if places foot against foot and that forces its shield against one another shield, Top of a mountain against top of a mountain and helmet against helmet. That it approaches its chest of one another chest and if has beaten against its adversary, Cerrando firmly in its hand its sword or its lana.' ' Calinos, I break up, I, 5-19 ' ' That it can hurl its spear a last time while agonizes, Therefore he is honroso and glorious that a man fights For its country, its children and its loved wife Against the enemy. The death will come When the destination to want, But all, humble and great, carry the same fight when a warrior suffers. The suffering of this man of strong soul reaches the people all, Case it dies. If it lives, it receives the honors due to heris.' ' The verses of the elegacos poets Tirteu and Calinos seem to evoke, being losted in thought its poetical or purely aesthetic value, the basic question of the wakening of a new form of combat in the Greek world, of the combat in mass of a commanded group and coeso, that is, the archaic hopltica phalanx. Tirteu was, what he seems, contemporary of the Second Messnia War, occured in the second half of century VII B.C., for return of 640-50 Calinos B.C. Recently Andy Florance sought to clarify these questions.

(sc. VII B.C.), as its Tirteu contemporary, was notabilizou for the composition of the probably older poetries of the elegaco sort. The verses of both the poets allow to elucidate some aspects of the hoplita combat and its warlike tactics, already then ressignificadas in terms of innovations techniques. But it is excessively more excellent to this analysis, stops beyond the strategical aspects of war, to point out the events in relation to the great moment of transistion in which if they insert, crucial moment and remarkably marked by deep vicissitudes in the Greek societies, and that corroborates in the direction to point a new organizacional axle of uncosteded importance in history Greek who if follows to it: the reality of the plis, the city-state par excellence.

The preparation of the Brazilian professors for the use of medias and didactic-pedagogical digital objects as material still leaves very to desire. According to Schmidt (2003), in the formation of professors of History, great part of the pupils of the course of History, it delays much time so that the same ones enter in classroom? what it only happens in the last periods of the college. The student passes little time following professors and giving lessons, what she harms its formation. In the truth, what it is observed is that the universities do not prepare the professionals who leave for the market of work for simple challenges of the daily professor as to know if a question easy or difficult for is determined education segment. Additional information is available at Pete Cashmore. On the basis of this reality, let us see some now reflections on the four points of the cited quarrel of this article at the beginning of this work. 2.1.Objetivos It is important not to forget objective them the lesson, which are these the norteadores of the actions to be developed for the professor of History. Therefore, before if worrying on as to develop the work it must be asked why to teach to this or that content? Where point it will go to contribute for the learning of the pupil? The boarding in the history education cannot atrelar to study it the past for the past, but the lessons need to be engaged also with the gift, the service of the understanding and the interpretation of the world and, on the other hand, to have as ballast the historical facts (in case that contrary, we will be constructing fiction), (MOREIRA and VASCONCELOS, 2009). Following this same line of thought the authors defend one practical educative one who have as objective to make with that each aluno/a also perceives its experiences as historical party to suit. To know more about this subject visit altavista.

But to test some of these hypotheses, as the umbrella of the TNP (1968) and its relation with the rebellious States and the terrorism, let us consider that, of one it has ahead attacked nuclear, state or terrorist, the States of the TNP (1968) would meet ahead of a quandary without solution: to answer or not to an attack in the same ratio, that is, with nuclear weapons. The first legal impediment would be proportionality of the reply (of the retortion), since nuclear weapons, as well as the chemical and biological weapons, do not distinguish between terrorists and civilians. As, it would be the identification of the responsible ones, nominated governments, not States, in connection or not with terrorists, as it was the case of the Taleb government in the Afeganisto in relation to the terrorists of the Al-Qaeda: how to punish the Government without punishing the State? Thus, if the quandary of the TNP (1968) would not have solution, as one treated formal one and legally binding politics would have preponderantly to be considered in its source, that is, as one ' ' umbrella of dissuaso' ' , whose effectiveness cannot be measured in terms of guarantees effective (guarantees of execution), since efficient guarantee some can emerge of a system of balance that more if does not base only nor relations between Estadospotncias, but in the competition of other rebellious States e, mainly, of not-state actors, as the terrorists, for one parcels out technical limitless of being able, in the case of being able to militate, long ago privilege of few States. In the military field, Ir and Coreia of the north dispute place still more enter the State-powers in the military source, since comparativily to the economic sphere it is much more easy to become a power producing nuclear bombs, if already technology for this is had. These comments under the legal source and politics of the TNP (1968), and of its balance of being able in the nuclear sphere, allow to conclude that if it deals with an instrument International law of contradictory content, since it is established in an absence of balance of being able to militate for the resignation to nuclear weapons e, to exactly time, in the maintenance of a polar region of multiple powers (unimultipolarizao) that it allows can it withhold such weapons, as a protective umbrella that must be efficient, even though to use them. .